HOME |  CULT MOVIES | COMPETITIONS | ADVERTISE |  CONTACT US |  ABOUT US
 
 
Newest Reviews
Black '47
Godfather Part II, The
Await Further Instructions
Ewoks: The Battle for Endor
In Order of Disappearance
Charlotte's Web
Meg, The
Christmas Blood
Equalizer 2, The
1985
Mowgli
Ski School
Ant-Man and the Wasp
Age of Shadows, The
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Othello
First Reformed
Red White and Zero
Death Wish
Cry Wilderness
Heiresses, The
Millhouse: A White Comedy
Skyscraper
Born of Fire
Teen Titans Go! To the Movies
Lucia
Yanks
Sweet November
Ballad of Buster Scruggs, The
Real Men
   
 
Newest Articles
Phone Freak: When a Stranger Calls on Blu-ray
A Name to Conjure With: David Nixon's Magic Box on DVD
Which 1950s Sci-Fi was Scariest? Invaders from Mars vs The Blob
The Empire Strikes Back: Khartoum vs Carry On Up the Khyber
Stan and Ollie's Final Folly: Atoll K on Blu-ray
The Big Grapple: Escape from New York and Its Influence
The Conquest of Everett: The Kenny Everett Video Show on DVD
Bout for the Count: Hammer's Dracula in the 1970s
Nopes from a Small Island: Mistreatment of American Stars in British Films
You Know, For Kids: Children's Film Foundation Bumper Box
If He Were a Carpenter and It Was the 80s: The Fog, Prince of Darkness and They Live
Tee-Hee, It's 80s Sci-Fi Horror: Night of the Comet, The Stuff and Night of the Creeps
Chance of a Ghost: The Uninvited and The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
3 Simian Slashers: Phenomena, Link and Monkey Shines
When is a Jackie Chan Movie Not a Jackie Chan Movie? Armour of God and City Hunter
   
 
  Man Who Knew Too Much, The A Little Knowledge Is A Dangerous ThingBuy this film here.
Year: 1956
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Stars: James Stewart, Doris Day, Brenda De Banzie, Bernard Miles, Ralph Truman, Daniel Gélin, Mogens Weith, Alan Mowbray, Hillary Brooke, Christopher Olsen, Reggie Nalder, Richard Wattis, Noel Willman, Alix Talton, Yves Brainville, Carolyn Jones, Walter Gotell
Genre: Thriller
Rating:  6 (from 2 votes)
Review: The McKenna family - doctor Ben (James Stewart), ex-singer Jo (Doris Day) and their son Hank (Christopher Olsen) - are on holiday, travelling through Europe and North Africa. By this time they are on a bus to Marrakesh, where they are chatting about the scenery when Hank gets restless and starts investigating the vehicle, then is suddenly thrown backwards as the bus jolts awkwardly, accidentally grabbing the veil of a local woman. Her husband is furious, but a French stranger (Daniel Gélin) intervenes, and they strike up a friendship - but what do the McKennas really know about him?

Not much, and by the end you'll be none too sure what he was up to yourself as the whole mystery Frenchman character, Mr Bernard, remains an enigma even when you have an idea of what the whole plot was about. Nevertheless, why he picked on the McKennas is murky, and makes the opening act look like an excuse for a spot of exotic location footage, though given director Alfred Hitchcock's predeliction for shooting his cast in the studio and projecting that footage on an obvious screen behind them you may be wondering why he took them all to Morocco at all. That said, if you're watching a Hitchcock you have to be prepared for some degree of artificiality.

This was a remake of his 1934 thriller, reputedly his most successful film in Britain, which he felt the need to return to in a far more glossy fashion, in his words, "professional" rather than "amateur", though funnily enough when looking back he preferred his first version. Plenty of people would sympathise with that, and for a long time if this remake wasn't considered a mistake, the lack of that quirkiness which so distinguished the original was missed by many who gave this variation a go. But then there were the dissenting voices who began to make themselves heard, telling us the 1956 movie was actually the better one, with more accomplished setpieces and an example of Hitch at the top of his game, subverting the cosy American nuclear family with dangerous espionage when they dare outside their comfort zone.

The truth of that is very much a matter of personal taste, but if the second telling was slicker, there was much to appreciate even if for all its supposed achievements in method and style the more ramshackle thirties effort had a charm this lacked. But the setpieces were there to be impressed by: the scene in the market where the Arab being pursued stumbles up to Ben with a knife in his back, falling into his arms and leaving his brown face makeup on Ben's hands is among the most famous, in spite of that image lasting mere seconds. As the man dies, he is revealed to be Bernard, and gives Ben some whispered information about an assassination plot in London, which is where the McKennas head for - but not together, as Hank is kidnapped as a way to prevent them from going to the police.

The police are well aware something is up, but allow Ben and Jo to get on with their rescue bid; Day was especially fine in her scenes where she gets emotional about the fate of her son, and indeed offered the best performance in the film, proving herself dramatically when it's all too simple to remember her as a light comedienne with a big singing voice. There is a plot reason for Jo being an ex-stage crooner, and that became her signature song Que Sera, Sera: oddly it's a tune bellowed by Day at the top of her lungs in the tense finale, not heard to its best effect but becoming inescapable anyway. There were two grand finales as it turned out, one before that where the action is moved to The Albert Hall for an assassination attempt courtesy of the baddies (Reggie Nalder is the man holding the gun) as composer Bernard Herrmann shows up to conduct the orchestra, but the humour was restricted to a couple of bits, one in a taxidermist's: this was a more serious relating of the story, which had its moments but wasn't top flight Hitchcock.
Reviewer: Graeme Clark

 

This review has been viewed 2061 time(s).

As a member you could Rate this film

 

Alfred Hitchcock  (1899 - 1980)

Hugely influential British director, renowned as "The Master of Suspense" for his way with thrillers. His first recognisably Hitchcockian film was The Lodger, but it was only until Blackmail (the first British sound film) that he found his calling. His other 1930s films included a few classics: Number Seventeen, The Man Who Knew Too Much, The 39 Steps, Secret Agent, Sabotage, The Lady Vanishes, Young and Innocent and Jamaica Inn.

Producer David O. Selznick gave Hitchcock his break in Hollywood directing Rebecca, and he never looked back. In the forties were Suspicion, thinly veiled propaganda Foreign Correspondent, the single set Lifeboat, Saboteur, Notorious, Spellbound (with the Salvador Dali dream sequence), Shadow of a Doubt (his personal favourite) and technician's nightmare Rope.

In the fifties were darkly amusing Strangers on a Train, I Confess, Dial M for Murder (in 3-D), rare comedy The Trouble with Harry, Rear Window, a remake of The Man Who Knew Too Much, To Catch a Thief, the uncharacteristic in style The Wrong Man, the sickly Vertigo, and his quintessential chase movie, North By Northwest. He also had a successful television series around this time, which he introduced, making his distinctive face and voice as recognisable as his name.

The sixties started strongly with groundbreaking horror Psycho, and The Birds was just as successful, but then Hitchcock went into decline with uninspired thrillers like Marnie, Torn Curtain and Topaz. The seventies saw a return to form with Frenzy, but his last film Family Plot was disappointing. Still, a great career, and his mixture of romance, black comedy, thrills and elaborate set pieces will always entertain. Watch out for his cameo appearances in most of his films.

 
Review Comments (4)
Posted by:
Andrew Pragasam
Date:
2 Oct 2012
  Among the most enduringly influential Hitchcock films, if the proliferation of kidnap-themed thrillers over the past decade is any indication. Personally I do prefer the British version for a variety of reasons, but wouldn't write this one off. It is handsomely crafted, never less than compelling and often charming what with Doris Day (who acquits herself very well) performing her classic Que Cera Cera.
       
Posted by:
Graeme Clark
Date:
2 Oct 2012
  Strange thing about Doris singing Que Sera, Sera here, the first time she does it mostly with the tone-deaf little boy taking most of the lines, then the second time she's tearfully yelling it, so neither time do you hear it sung properly. I suppose it was catchy enough to survive.
       
Posted by:
Enoch Sneed
Date:
6 Jul 2015
  Seeing Doris Day's performance in this film, I have often thought she could have done a good job as Marion Crane in Psycho. Intriguing casting, at least, wouldn't you say?
       
Posted by:
Graeme Clark
Date:
6 Jul 2015
  Doris was terrorised surprisingly often in thrillers, but the point of putting her in that difficult position was to see her win through in the end, which Psycho wouldn't have been interested in. So intriguing casting, but miscasting probably.
       


Untitled 1

Login
  Username:
 
  Password:
 
   
 
Forgotten your details? Enter email address in Username box and click Reminder. Your details will be emailed to you.
   

Latest Poll
Which star do you think makes the best coffee?
Emma Stone
Anna Kendrick
Michelle Rodriguez
Sir Patrick Stewart
   
 
   

Recent Visitors
Graeme Clark
Stately Wayne Manor
George White
Paul Smith
Andrew Pragasam
Darren Jones
Aseels Almasi
Rashed Ali
   

 

Last Updated: